Loading...
moimflow is a tool for "fun + understanding". We gathered common questions about chemistry scores/types, role suggestions, and interpretation in one place.
In short, it shows whether people's thinking styles connect naturally within a group.
Based on members' MBTI, moimflow organizes the relationship graph, chemistry scores, and role suggestions in an easy-to-read way.
No. It does not only compare letters like E/I or N/S. It also references cognitive function combinations (thinking habits).
So even with the same MBTI, the experience can feel different by topic, situation, and role.
Not necessarily. The score is closer to "a combination with fewer conflicts and smoother flow" and is not a direct measure of closeness or preference.
Even with a low score, groups can work very well if communication rules, roles, and tone are adjusted.
All member pairs in the group are generated, then ranked by score. As member count grows, combinations and rankings become richer.
"Worst" is not blame. It means a pair that may require more coordination points.
moimflow shows representative pairs by type using scores, so you can quickly see which patterns are common in your group.
Using members' MBTI, role tendencies such as strategy, vibe, execution, organization, and mediation are estimated with simple rules.
It is less about "this person must do this role" and more about who can naturally take each role in this specific group.
Without MBTI, some analyses (chemistry score/type, distribution) are limited. Chemistry ranking and type classification work when at least two members enter MBTI.
If MBTI is edited, results are recalculated immediately. Also, groups are shaped by people + context, so treat results as reference.
In many cases, the ambiguous score zone improves a lot once simple conversation rules are set.
moimflow is designed to work with minimal inputs and recommends using only nickname and MBTI for analysis.
We recommend not entering sensitive information such as real name or contact details.
No. The goal is not to judge people, but to quickly identify points that may create misunderstandings and points that help collaboration flow.
Even with lower scores, teams can improve a lot by aligning conversation pace, decision criteria, and tone.