Loading...
A team where only the talkative people keep talking, and the quiet people speak separately after the meeting. How to reduce the variation in speaking volume through ‘rules’ rather than ‘people problems’.
Someone comes to a conclusion before I can organize my thoughts.
When impromptu remarks are interpreted as ‘leadership’, quiet people become more silent.
30 second silence rule: **“After asking a question, 30 seconds is time to think”**
It's a question, but it feels like an interrogation.
If the question sounds evaluative, defenses go up, and only safe people speak.
Change the question frame: **“Let’s find the risks in this together”**
I can't speak during meetings, so I can only express my opinions through DM.
If a meeting only allows ‘real-time discussion’, thinking types are excluded.
Pre-entered 3 lines: **Receive 3 lines of ‘opinions/risks/alternatives’ before the meeting**
Meetings have become ‘a space only for speakers.’
It may not be agreement, but silence.
Psychological safety decreases.
Prevents fast people from driving alone.
Example: “Just think for 30 seconds and say one line at a time.”
Everyone gets a turn.
Example: “Each person in one line, full/half/condition only.”
It prevents opposition from building up.
Example: “On the other hand, there is one alternative.”
Silent comments are withdrawn.
Example: “We will accept additional comments for 10 minutes after the end.”
Try saying: “Okay. This time, let’s listen to each line in rounds and put them back together.”
Try saying: “It’s not a question of evaluation, but a question of finding risks together.”
A. Therefore, it is better to keep the ‘pre/post-input’ channel open, rather than ‘remarks during the meeting’.
A. If you only allow ‘one line’ at first, the burden is greatly reduced.
I have a meeting, but when it's over, it feels like there's nothing left. We have organized a structure where decisions cannot be made and words/rules for reaching conclusions without breaking the team spirit.
A team that loses speed while trying to reduce risk. This is not to abandon perfectionism, but it is a way to ‘stage’ perfection so that the team can safely become faster.
A team that is quiet in meetings, but whose complaints only leak out behind the scenes. We have organized devices that change feedback from being a battle between people to a ‘fight for results.’
The intention is to deal with the situation quickly, but the opponent feels it is an attack. We have compiled sentences/rules to reduce misunderstandings in asynchronous communication.